The Relationship Between Teacher Well-Being and Educational Innovation in the Digital Age: Empirical Evidence from Higher Education at the University of Guayaquil

Main Article Content

Maria Isabel Vieyra Villala
Mariela Alava Macias
Michael Jose Ortega Tambaco

Abstract

This article analyzed the relationship between faculty well-being and educational innovation in the digital age within the context of higher education at the University of Guayaquil. The objective was to determine how the use of digital technologies and the development of technological competencies influence faculty workload, stress levels, and emotional well-being, as well as pedagogical innovation.  A quantitative, non-experimental, descriptive, and cross-sectional approach was used, with a sample of 60 university faculty members selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected using a semi-structured questionnaire and analyzed using descriptive statistics. The results show that the incorporation of digital technologies has fostered new forms of teaching and promoted educational innovation. However, the findings also indicate that this process has increased the workload and stress levels among a significant portion of the faculty. In this regard, it is concluded that faculty well-being is a key element for digital innovation in higher education to be sustainable and truly effective.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Vieyra Villala, M. I. ., Alava Macias, M. ., & Ortega Tambaco, M. J. . (2026). The Relationship Between Teacher Well-Being and Educational Innovation in the Digital Age: Empirical Evidence from Higher Education at the University of Guayaquil . Espirales Revista Multidisciplinaria De investigación, 57(3), 48–57. https://doi.org/10.31876/er.v57i3.931
Section
Artículos
Share |

References

Area, M. (2019). Education in the Digital Society. Octaedro.

Cabero-Almenara, J., & Llorente-Cejudo, M. C. (2020). Digital Technologies and the Transformation of Higher Education. Revista Educación, 44(2), 1–15.

De Pablos-Pons, J., Colás-Bravo, P., & González-Ramírez, T. (2011). Faculty Well-being and Innovation with Information and Communication Technologies.

Egüez, R. C., Morán Peña, F. J., & Morán Egüez, F. A. (2024). Development of teaching skills and their relationship to educational innovation in higher education. Science and Education. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18356590

Garcés Garcés, N. N. (2018). Eco-training for university faculty and its pedagogical model at the University of Guayaquil. INNOVA Research Journal, 3(12), 167–176. https://doi.org/10.33890/innova.v3.n12.2018.802

Marcillo Peralta, J., Tello Arévalo, S., Varas Contreras, J., & Llerena Choez, E. (2023). Educational technological innovation from the teaching perspective in higher education. Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar, 8(4), 2196–2210. https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v8i4.12458

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2021). Reimagining Our Futures Together: A New Social Contract for Education. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2022). Teaching in the Digital Age: Supporting Teachers in Digital Transformation. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/

Páez-Granja, R., & Martínez-González, A. B. (2019). Educational innovation and its impact on teachers. Revista Cátedra, 2(3), 82–94. https://doi.org/10.29166/catedra.v2i3.1803

Saborío-Taylor, S. (2024). The influence of teaching in the digital age: Perspectives from Education 5.0. Revista Innovaciones Educativas, 26(Special Issue), 88–102. https://doi.org/10.22458/ie.v26iespecial.5321

Valverde-Berrocoso, J., Fernández-Sánchez, M. R., & Revuelta-Domínguez, F. I. (2013). Subjective well-being in the context of best educational practices using ICT. Educación XX1, 16(1), 255–279. https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.16.1.726

Zárate-Flores, A., Gurieva, N., & Jiménez-Arredondo, V. H. (2020). The holistic practice of teachers’ digital competencies. Pensamiento Educativo, 57(1). https://doi.org/10.7764/PEL.57.1.2020.10