University governance and meaning production: planning and management in a religious context

Main Article Content

Karina Beatriz Puente

Abstract

This article is a preview of a doctoral thesis on governance at a privately-run religious university in Argentina between 2020 and 2025. The objective was to identify anticipated meanings in the semantic field of "planning and management strategy." The sample was based on an in-depth interview with a member of the Board of Directors, framed within an intrinsic case study. The methodology used was discourse analysis, following the operations of Magariños de Morentín's logical-operational model. The results revealed three nodes of meaning that reflected a managerial-participatory conception of governance, framed within a Catholic institutional identity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Beatriz Puente, K. . (2026). University governance and meaning production: planning and management in a religious context. Espirales Revista Multidisciplinaria De investigación, 10(56), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.31876/er.v10i56.899
Section
Artículos
Share |

References

Acosta-Silva, A., Ganga-Contreras, F., & Rama-Vitale, C. (2021). University governance: conceptual approaches and scope. Ibero-American Journal of Higher Education, 12(33).

Alarcón, M., & Brunner, J. (2024). Multigoverance in higher education: The case of Chile 2018-2023. In Education Research, 119(1), 97–118.

Bourdieu, P. (1994) The scientific field. Networks: Journal of Social Studies of Science. 1(2), 129-160. Available at RIDAA-UNQ Institutional Digital Open Access Repository of the National University of Quilmes http://ridaa.unq.edu.ar/handle/20.500.11807/317

Bourdieu, P. (1994). Practical Reasons: On the Theory of Action. Seuil.

Bourdieu, P. (2002). Field of power, intellectual field. Itinerary of a concept. Montressor

Bourdieu, P. (2007b) [1987], Social Space and Symbolic Power in: Bourdieu, Pierre. Things Said. Gedisa, pp. 127-142

Bourdieu, Pierre (2000a). On symbolic power. In Power, Law, Law and Social Classes. Desclée de Brower.

Brunner, J. J. (2011). University governance: typologies, dynamics, and trends. Santiago, Chile: Diego Portales University.

Clark, B. R. (2023). Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational Pathways to Transformation. Elsevier.

Ganga-Contreras, F. (2019). Governance and management of higher education in Latin America. Journal of Higher Education, 48(2), 33-52.

Ganga-Contreras, F. (2024). Governance, government, and management in higher education: current configurations. In Higher Education and Society, 36(1), 15–28.

García, M., & Hernández, M. (2020, January). Quality management and university governance. Configuration of discourses and practices in private universities in Colombia and Argentina. Presentation at the VIII Ibero-American Congress on University Governance Research, Institutional Repository - Universidad Santo Tomás, Bogotá, Colombia. https://repository.usta.edu.co/handle/11634/35248

Lamarra, N. (2022). Transformations and challenges in Latin American higher education. Miño y Dávila.

Magaríños de Morentín, J. A. (1998). Operational manual for the development of "contextual definitions" and "contrasting networks." Signa: Journal of the Spanish Association of Semiotics, 7, 233–253. https://doi.org/10.5944/signa.vol7.1998.32911 (The Semiotics of the Word).

Magariños de Morentín, J. A. (2002). The logical foundations of semiotics and its practice. Edicial.

Magariños de Morentín, J. A. (2021). Social semiosis revisited. Biblos.

Valdés-Montecinos, M., and Ganga-Contreras, F. (2021). University governance: Theoretical approaches to interest groups in higher education institutions. Revista de Ciencias Sociales (Ve), 27(3), 441-45

Verón, E. (1984). Semiosis of ideology and power. Journal: Spaces of criticism and production, 43-51.

Verón, E. (2011). Social semiosis. Fragment of a theory of discursivity. Gedisa

Most read articles by the same author(s)