Diagnosis of Seismic Vulnerability in Residential Buildings in the Parroquias Pedro Carbo and Rocafuerte, Guayaquil, Applying the FEMA P-154 Methodology

Main Article Content

Franklin Parra
Maria Elena Vargas
Adalberto Vizconde
Andrés Villamar
Gladys Castro

Abstract

This study evaluates the seismic vulnerability of buildings in Guayaquil, a city located on the Pacific Ring of Fire and therefore prone to earthquakes. Using the FEMA P-154 method, 168 buildings in the urban parishes of Pedro Carbo and Rocafuerte were inspected. Most of the structures evaluated (91%) were moment-resisting concrete frames. Older buildings, built before the implementation of modern seismic codes, showed higher vulnerability. The parameters considered included construction material, height, age, structural configuration, soil condition and maintenance. Buildings with S values between 0.3 and 0.7 were found to have a high probability of severe damage. The most vulnerable buildings were the Hotel Patrimonial, Hotel Manso Boutique and Hotel Perla Central. Solutions such as the use of carbon fiber, column jacketing and improved structural connections were proposed to mitigate these risks. Most of the buildings present high seismic vulnerability, with "El Gran Pasaje" being the most vulnerable. It is crucial to perform detailed inspections and reinforce old structures to reduce seismic risks in Guayaquil.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Parra, F., Vargas, M. E., Vizconde, A. ., Villamar, A., & Castro, G. (2025). Diagnosis of Seismic Vulnerability in Residential Buildings in the Parroquias Pedro Carbo and Rocafuerte, Guayaquil, Applying the FEMA P-154 Methodology. Espirales Revista Multidisciplinaria De investigación, 8(1), 54–68. https://doi.org/10.31876/er.v8i1.881
Section
Artículos
Share |

References

Aguiar, R. (March 2011). Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280495058_El_mega_sismo_de_Chile_de_2010_y_lecciones_para_Ecuador

ANCLAF. (2024). Structural Reinforcement with Carbon Fiber. Retrieved from https://anclaf.com/reforzamiento-estructural-con-fibra-de-carbono/

ATC 21. (1998). Seismic Vulnerability Assessment Method

Campos Cordova, M. J. (2019). Design of column and beam reinforcement using the jacketing technique and the structural behavior of a house. doi:https://repositorio.upn.edu.pe/handle/11537/21249

Cype (January 26, 2024). WELDED CONNECTIONS. Retrieved from https://www.cype.pe/blog/conexiones-soldadas-o-atornilladas/

FCMF (2023). Evaluation of the seismic vulnerability of buildings located in the Rocafuerte and Pedro Carbo parishes in the city of guayaquil. Guayaquil: Faculty of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Universidad de Guayaquil.

FEMA P-154. (2015). Rapid Visual Screening of Buildings for Potential Seismic Hazards: A Handbook (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). Retrieved from https://www.fema.gov/sites/default/files/2020-07/fema_earthquakes_rapid-visual-screening-of-buildings-for-potential-seismic-hazards-a-handbook-third-edition-fema-p-154.pdf

MIDUVI (2020). Administrative and technical procedure manual for the evaluation of buildings owned by the Ministry of Urban Development and Housing

NEC-SE-DS. (2015). Seismic Loads Seismic Resistant Design. 139.

NEC-SE-DS. (2015). SEISMIC LOADS SEISMIC RESISTANT DESIGN. 139.

Peñuela, G. G., Manchego, D. V., & León, W. J. (2007). Some applications of finite elements in the structural analysis of a bracket, a footing on piles, shells and concrete connections. Science and Engineering Neogranadina, 17(1), 63-78.

Salazar-Arbelaez, G. (2018). Earthquakes and health: lessons and recommendations. Dr. Gabriel Salazar-Arbelaez, 2.

SENPLADES (2012). Generation of Geoinformation for land management at national level scale 1:25000, Memoria Técnica Cantón Guayaquil. Ministry of National Defense. Retrieved from https://www.geoportaligm.gob.ec/geodescargas/guayaquil/mt_guayaquil_socioeconomico.pdf

Theurer, M. M., & Rodriguez, J. (November 24, 2016). Carbon fibers as an alternative for structure reinforcement.20 (1), 57-62. doi:https://www.redalyc.org/journal/467/46750927006/html/