Legal analysis of the appraisal of evidence based on the rules of sound judgement
Main Article Content
Abstract
The legal analysis of the evaluation of evidence in the Ecuadorian context focuses on the application of sound criticism on the evidentiary means provided by the parties against the decision adopted by the judges. The main objective of the study is to analyze the lack of normative and doctrinal development regarding the rules of sound criticism, by establishing its clarification and definition to ensure an objective evaluation of evidence in judicial proceedings. In Ruling No. 305-17-sep-cc case No. 1597-16-ep (2017), the Constitutional Court highlighted the importance of applying sound criticism in a consistent and motivated manner, through the support of prudential rules of a legal nature. The case law, in this case, highlights the correct application of the rules of sound criticism by the judges of the Labor Chamber of the National Court of Justice. The judgment illustrates the importance of clearly motivating judicial decisions, ensuring transparency and legitimacy. It concludes that the absence of clear criteria for the implementation of sound criticism in Ecuadorian law highlights the need for legislative revision. The importance of establishing specific parameters to guarantee a well-founded, objective and impartial evaluation of evidence in the judicial sphere is emphasized.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Licensing Agreement
This journal provides free access to its content through its website following the principle that making research available free of charge to the public supports a larger exchange of global knowledge.
Web content of the journal is distributed under a Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International.
Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements for the distribution of the version of the published work, provided that the initial publication in this journal is indicated. Authors are allowed and recommended to disseminate their work through the internet before and during the submission process, which can produce interesting exchanges and increase citations of the published work.
References
Alvarenga Vásquez, J. S. (2017). Ethical application of sound criticism in the evaluation of evidence in the Salvadoran civil and commercial process.
Angulo, J. P. D. (2016). The presuppositions of sound criticism: are our judges prepared for sound criticism. Revista de derecho, (20), 47-69.
Artavia, S., & Picado, C. (2018). Evidence in general. Costa Rican Institute of Scientific Procedural Law.
Cárdenas, K., & Cárdenas, C. (2022). La Prueba y su Valoración dentro del Código Orgánico General de Procesos, Ecuador. Revista científica Sociedad & Tecnología, 5(s1), 17-29.
Cárdenas, P. (2021). The evaluation of evidence in criminal proceedings: a constitutional perspective. Revista Universidad y Sociedad, 13(2), 160-169. http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?pid=S2218-36202021000200160&script=sci_arttext&tlng=en
General Organic Code of Proceedings. (2015). National Assembly. https://www.lexis.com.ec/biblioteca/cogep
Coloma, R., & Aguero, C. (2014). Logic, science and expertise in the valuation of evidence. Revista chilena de derecho, 41(2), 673-703. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-34372014000200011.
Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador (2008). Quito: RO 449.
Constitutional Court of Ecuador (September 13, 2017). SENTENCE N.° 305-17-SEP-CC.
Constitutional Court of Ecuador (October 20, 2021). Sentence 1158-17-EP/21: Guarantee of the motivation. http://esacc.corteconstitucional.gob.ec/storage/api/v1/10_DWL_FL/e2NhcnBldGE6J3RyYW1pdGUnLCB1dWlkOidkYjI2NzM0NS05MjE2LTQ1ZDMtOGE5Ny03YTg2ZTAyMmYwYmYucGRmJ30=?fbclid=IwAR1ArJVS3zV7Q-WA4PsQ_BzRVA6wx9DEbmPHuxiWGijvVGH6nodJ3dit9hk
Couture, E. (1958). Derecho procesal civil. Fundamentos del Derecho Procesal Civil.
Escobar Pérez, M. J. (2010). La valoración de la prueba, en la motivación de una sentencia en la legislación ecuatoriana (Master's thesis, Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar, Sede Ecuador).
Escobar, J. (2018). Sound criticism and the oblivion of the rules of sound criticism. Revista de Derecho, 31(1), 303-325. https://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?pid=S0718-09502018000100303&script=sci_abstract.
García Costa, F. M. (2011). General issues on the principle of objectivity. DA Revista Documentación Administrativa, (289).
Gijón, J. M. (1961). Judicial evidence in the territorial law of Navarre and Aragon during the late Middle Ages. Anuario de Historia del Derecho español, 17-54.
González Castillo, J. (2006). The basis of judgments and sound criticism. Revista chilena de derecho, 33(1), 93-107.
Hernandez, J. (2020). The economic impact of COVID-19 (new coronavirus). Deloitte, 2-3.
Jara Vásquez, L.A (2021). La sana crítica como concepto jurídico indeterminado para la admisión de la prueba nueva en el Código Orgánico General de Procesos. Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar.
Lasso, J. (2009). Logic and Sound Criticism. Revista Chilena de Derecho, 31(1), 143-164. doi:https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/1770/177014521007.pdf
Macías, S. (2023). Evidentiary reasoning, sound criticism and judicial motivation in quaestio facti. MQRInvestigar, 7(2), 578-613. http://www.investigarmqr.com/ojs/index.php/mqr/article/view/362.
Melo, R. (2012). EL ESTADO DE EXCEPCIÓN EN EL ECUADOR Y SU RELACIÓN CON EL ESTADO DE DERECHO. (MASTER'S THESIS IN LAW). UNIVERSIDAD ANDINA SIMÓN BOLÍVAR, ECUADOR.
Pfeffer, E. (2018). States of Constitutional Exception and Constitutional Reform . Ius Et Praxis, 223-250.
Pillajo, M. A. L. (2017). Legal reasoning: logic, interpretation and argumentation. Revista Facultad de Jurisprudencia, (1), 59-80.
Rivera Morales, R. (2011). La prueba: un análisis racional y práctico. Marcial Pons.
Rivera, F., & Rojas, L. (2020). Interdisciplinary study on the Systems of Valuation and Evidentiary Standards in Colombian procedural law. https://doi.org/10.16925/2357-5891.2019.02.01
Rodríguez Serpa, F., & Tuirán Gutierrez, J. P. (2011). The rational assessment of evidence. JURÍDICAS CUC.
Ruiz Bravo, A., & Jiménez Valera, M. (2020). SARS-CoV-2 and pandemic acute respiratory syndrome (COVID-19). Ars Pharmaceutica, 7-8.
Valenzuela, G. (2020). Current approach to the motivation of sentences. Its analysis as a component of due process. Revista de Derecho (Universidad Católica Dámaso A. Larrañaga, School of Law), 21, 72-90.